Don’t Ruin Us

Photograph: Getty Images

Enhancing Manchester United FC academy prospects

Manchester United has, in recent years, become a cautionary tale in the world of elite football; a club once synonymous with excellence, now often described as a graveyard for world-class talent. Players of the highest calibre have seen their performances diminish to the level of amateur footballers, seemingly participating only sporadically and without consistency. Over the past decade, the club has devolved into a self-indulgent institution, fostering a culture of entitlement wherein players expect extended contracts and regular appearances regardless of merit.

The administrative direction of the club has been equally questionable. Individuals lacking experience at the highest levels of football governance, many of whom do not hold qualifications from top-tier institutions, have overseen strategic decisions. Their managerial approach has often involved offering excessive signing bonuses to agents and awarding inflated contracts to mediocre players. These decisions have made it increasingly difficult for the club to offload such players once their performance declines or their market value diminishes.

Once a symbol of footballing prestige, Manchester United is now frequently the subject of ridicule both within Manchester and globally. Competing clubs regard United’s recent misfortunes with a mix of amusement and disbelief. Symbolic of this decline are the deteriorating conditions at Old Trafford, where even the stadium roof has been reported to leak. Despite investing over a billion pounds on underwhelming talent, the club’s infrastructure and first-team performance have remained substandard. The sacking of four managers in a short span reflects the influence of player power, with a culture that resists managerial discipline and philosophical change.

Since Sir Alex Ferguson’s retirement, the club has failed to enact meaningful structural reform. Aside from managerial changes and a revolving door of signings, there has been little progress. The legacy of Ferguson’s leadership, defined by clear identity, player development, and discipline, has long since eroded. The famed Class of ’92 remains unmatched, with academy graduates today failing to evoke the same excitement. Even promising talents often adopt the entitled attitude of senior players, seeking financial rewards over footballing growth.

The cases of Marcus Rashford and Mason Greenwood exemplify the deeper cultural issues at the club. Rashford, while once heralded as a key figure, has largely underwhelmed on the pitch. His public prominence rose not through footballing excellence but through his commendable off-field efforts during the COVID-19 pandemic, most notably his campaign for free school meals. The club capitalised on this moment, elevating Rashford’s commercial profile and branding him as a club icon. In truth, his contributions are more akin to those of former players such as Danny Welbeck and Javier Hernández, reliable squad members, but not central stars.

Mismanagement has exacerbated Rashford’s stagnation. The absence of a coherent structure within the club has instilled in him an unjustified sense of indispensability. Although a capable Premier League player, Rashford does not currently warrant inclusion in the squads of top-tier teams within the division.

Mason Greenwood’s trajectory also reflects the club’s failure to uphold standards. The handling of his case underscores a culture in which players feel immune to accountability, both on and off the pitch. This lack of discipline and oversight has contributed to a toxic environment, where younger players observe and internalise a model of behaviour contrary to the club’s historic values.

While current managers’ performances have come under scrutiny, the players themselves must also assume responsibility. Many of the present squad have outlasted multiple managerial appointments, often contributing to their downfalls. The emerging generation: Kobbie Mainoo, Rasmus Højlund, and Alejandro Garnacho offers hope, reminiscent of the Class of ’92. However, realising their potential requires a nurturing environment underpinned by coherent coaching, a disciplined culture, and long-term footballing vision.

The recent involvement of INEOS in football operations may mark a turning point. Early signs suggest a commitment to structural reform, with the appointment of individuals possessing genuine footballing acumen. This move could herald the beginning of a much-needed cultural renaissance at the club.

To restore Manchester United’s identity and return to consistent success, several key changes are essential: the cessation of exorbitant contracts for underperforming players, investment in scouting and development of young talent, and the removal of individuals who prioritise financial gain over sporting integrity. Above all, safeguarding the development of emerging stars is paramount. The club must not allow another generation to be compromised by the systemic failings of its leadership.